Thanks answer Ian
I more check this problem..(Lucene 4.8.1)
1. acceptsDocsOutOfOrder() return false
==> ineffective
2. acceptsDocsOutOfOrder() return true
==> ineffective
3. ConncurrentLinkedQueue add() and poll() methods check value in
multi-thread
==> the queue is no problem.
4. Syncronized searcher.doc method call in multi-thread(like this: public
synchronized Document getValue( IndexSearcher searcher, int docId ) {
return searcher.doc( docId ); })
==> every execution is same.
but If I use this method, It is no difference with single thread
performance.
What do you think about it?
Thanks
2014-07-10 2:04 GMT+09:00 Ian Lea <ian....@gmail.com>:
> It's more likely to be a demonstration that concurrent programming is
> hard, results often hard to predict and debugging very hard.
>
> Or perhaps you simply need to add acceptsDocsOutOfOrder() to your
> collector, returning false.
>
> Either way, hard to see any evidence of a thread-safety problem in lucene.
>
> If adding acceptsDocsOutOfOrder() doesn't fix it, I suggest you verify
> that your queue is getting the values you expect, in the order you
> expect, consistently. Then worry about the display part, first
> checking everything without any lucene calls.
>
>
> --
> Ian.
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:59 AM, 김선무 <guks...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I know IndexSearcher is thread safe.
> > But IndexSearcher.doc is not thread safe maybe...
> >
> > I try to below
> > --------------------------------------------
> > First, I extract docID at index directory. And that docID add on
> > queue(ConcurrentLinkedQueue)
> >
> > Second, extract field value using docID poll at this queue after extract
> > process end. This process is work to multi-threads.
> >
> > For this I used the following summation code below:
> > searcher.search( query, filter, new Collector() { public void collect(
> int
> > doc ) { queue.add( docBase + doc ) } );
> > Thread thread1 = new Thread( () -> { while( !queue.isEmpty() ) {
> > System.out.println( searcher.doc(queue.poll()).get("content") ); } } );
> > Thread thread2 = new Thread( thread1 );
> > thread1.start();
> > thread2.start();
> > -------------------------------------------
> >
> > Result was different in every execution.
> >
> > My method is wrong? or IndexSearcher bug?
> >
> > Please help me
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
