Hi Adrien, thank you very much for your reply.
> FieldValueQuery is indeed the replacement. I you don't plan on adding other > clauses to the boolean query, you can even run the FieldValueQuery directly > through IndexSearcher, without wrapping it in a BooleanQuery. yes, I have this working now. > The fact that you need to index doc values is related to another change in > which we removed Lucene's FieldCache and now recommend to use doc values > instead. Until you reindex with doc values, you can temporarily use > UninvertingReader[1] to have the same behaviour as in Lucene 4.x. Is indexing doc values vs. UninvertingReader a space/time tradeoff? Or is the general recommendation to index doc values and only resort to an UninvertingReader when a full 4.x to 5.x conversion is to costly in terms of dev. hours? Best wishes, Andreas -- Codetrails GmbH The knowledge transfer company Robert-Bosch-Str. 7, 64293 Darmstadt Phone: +49-6151-276-7092 Mobile: +49-170-811-3791 http://www.codetrails.com/ Managing Director: Dr. Marcel Bruch Handelsregister: Darmstadt HRB 91940 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
