True, but Erick's questions are still valid :-). We need more info to answer these questions. So Simona, the more info you can give us the better we'll be able to answer.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016, 10:54 Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Hi Erick, > > this was a question about Lucene so "&debug=true" won't help. It also > talks about *Lucene's Facetting*, not Solr's. > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 8:22 AM > > To: java-user <java-user@lucene.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: Lucene Facets performance problems (version 4.7.2) > > > > You haven't given us much to go on. What is the cardinality of the fields > > you're faceting on? What does your query look like? How are you measuring > > time? What is the output if you add &debug=true? > > > > In short, your question is far too vague to give any meaningful > > information, there could be any of a dozen recommendations. > > > > Best > > Erick > > On Feb 26, 2016 18:01, "Simona Russo" <simoru...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > we use Lucene *Facet* library version* 4.7.2.* > > > > > > We have an *index* with *45 millions *of documents (size about 15 GB) > > and > > > a *taxonomy* index with *57* millions of documents (size about 2 GB). > > > > > > The total *facet search* time achieve *15 seconds*! > > > > > > Is it possible to improve this time? Is there any tips to *configure* > the > > > *taxonomy* index to avoid this waste of time? > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
