You can tell very little about performance with 50 documents, so I wouldn't trust these results at all. In particular I'm pretty sure that your search speed will suffer _greatly_ as you get more and more documents in your corpus if you use only DocValues but don't have indexed="true" set.
Best, Erick On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Chitra R <chithu.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I have one doubt. Actually I have indexed 50 documents for both > SortedNumericDocValuesField and IntField separately . Each document > consists of 49 fields. After that, i performed indexing & searching ( with > & without sorting) . > > It seems DocValuesField indexes and searches the documents faster than > normal FieldType (eg: IntField) and also it retrieves the values more > efficent than normal field. Is their any drawbacks to > use SortedNumericDocValuesField over IntField? > > Also It seems like we can use Docvalues Field(String or Numeric) > efficiently for any functionality(Searching and sorting). So generally, do > we have any drawbacks of using DocValues Field(String and Numeric)? > > > Known Drawbacks(on StringFields): > -->docvalues don't work on analyzed fields > -->search_analyzer cannot be specified on non-analyzed fields. > > is there any specific drawback on numeric docvalue fields? is range query > not possible?? or anyother? > > > Thanks, > Chitra --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
