Is this an "XY" problem? Meaning, why do you need DV fields larger than 32K?
You can't search it as text as it's not tokenized. Faceting and sorting by a 32K field doesn't seem very useful. You may have a perfectly valid reason, but it's not obvious what use-case you're serving from this thread so far.... Nobody has yet put forth a compelling use-case for such large fields, perhaps this would be one. Best, Erick On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Sheng <sheng...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mike - Thanks for the prompt response. Is there a way to bypass this > constraint for SortedDocValueField ? Or we have to live with it, meaning no > fix even in future release? > > On Wednesday, July 6, 2016, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> > wrote: > >> I believe only binary DVs can be larger than 32K bytes. >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >> >> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Sheng <sheng...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am getting an IAE indicating one of the SortedDocValueField is too >> large, >> > > 32k >> > >> > I googled a bit, and it seems like #Lucene-4583 has addressed this issue >> in >> > 4.5 and 6.0, while I am currently using Lucene 6.1. Do I miss or >> > misunderstand anything ? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
