It's partially right! E.g. IndexWriter will use less memory, and so you'll get better indexing throughput with a ShortPoint and BytePoint.
But index size will be the same, because Lucene's default codec does a good job compressing these values. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Cristian Lorenzetto < cristian.lorenze...@gmail.com> wrote: > sorry but I was developping a shortPoint and BytePoint for less using less > memory space. it is wrong? > > 2016-08-09 22:01 GMT+02:00 Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>: > > > It's best to index numeric using the new dimensional points, e.g. > IntPoint. > > > > Mike McCandless > > > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Cristian Lorenzetto < > > cristian.lorenze...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > how to encode a short or a byte type in byteRef in lucene 6.1? > > > > > >
