You would need to override the wrapComponents method in order to wrap the tokenstream. See for instance Lucene's LimitTokenCountAnalyzer.
Le mar. 18 oct. 2016 à 18:46, Kumaran Ramasubramanian <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi Adrien > > How to do this? Any Pointers? > > > > If it is fine to add the ascii folding filter at the end of the analysis > > chain, then you could use AnalyzerWrapper. > > > > > > > - > Kumaran R > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Kumaran Ramasubramanian < > [email protected] > > wrote: > > > > > > > @Ahmet, Uwe: Thanks a lot for your suggestion. Already i have written > > custom analyzer as you said. But just trying to avoid new component in my > > search flow. > > > > @Adrien: how to add filter using AnalyzerWrapper. Any pointers? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I'd suggest to use CustomAnalyzer for defining your own analyzer. This > >> allows to build your own analyzer with the components (tokenizers and > >> filters) you like to have. > >> > >> Uwe > >> > >> ----- > >> Uwe Schindler > >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > >> http://www.thetaphi.de > >> eMail: [email protected] > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Adrien Grand [mailto:[email protected]] > >> > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 4:37 PM > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > Subject: Re: How to add ASCIIFoldingFilter in ClassicAnalyzer > >> > > >> > Hi Kumaran, > >> > > >> > If it is fine to add the ascii folding filter at the end of the > analysis > >> > chain, then you could use AnalyzerWrapper. Otherwise, you need to > >> create a > >> > new analyzer that has the same analysis chain as ClassicAnalyzer, plus > >> an > >> > ASCIIFoldingFilter. > >> > > >> > Le mar. 11 oct. 2016 à 16:22, Kumaran Ramasubramanian > >> > <[email protected]> > >> > a écrit : > >> > > >> > > Hi All, > >> > > > >> > > Is there any way to add ASCIIFoldingFilter over ClassicAnalyzer > >> without > >> > > writing a new custom analyzer ? should i extend StopwordAnalyzerBase > >> > again? > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > I know that ClassicAnalyzer is final. any special purpose for making > >> it as > >> > > final? Because, StandardAnalyzer was not final before ? > >> > > > >> > > public final class ClassicAnalyzer extends StopwordAnalyzerBase > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Kumaran R > >> > > > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > >
