Couple of things (and I know you've been around for a while, so pardon
me if it's all old hat to you):

1> if you run the entire "reproduce with" line and can get a
consistent failure, then you are half way there, nothing is as
frustrating as not getting failures reliably. The critical bit is
often the -Dtests.seed. As Michael mentioned, there are various
randomizations done for _many_ things in Lucene tests using a random
generator.  tests.seed, well, seeds that generator so it produces the
same numbers every time it's run with that seed. You'll see lots of
calls to a static ramdom() method calls. I'll add that if you want to
use randomness in your tests, use that method and do _not_ use a local
instance of Java's Random.

2> MIke: You say IntelliJ succeeds. But that'll use a new random()
seed. Once you run a test, in the upper right (on my version at
least), IntelliJ will show you a little box with the test name and you
can "edit configurations" on it. I often have luck by editing the
configuration and adding the test seed to the "VM option" box for the
test, just the "-Dtests.seed=35AF58F652536895" part. You can add all
of the -D flags in the "reproduce with" line if you want, but often
just the seed works for me. If that works and you track it down, do
remember to take that seed _out_ of the "VM options" box rather than
forget it as I have done ;)

3> Mark Miller's beasting script can be used to run a zillion tests
over night: https://gist.github.com/markrmiller/dbdb792216dc98b018ad

4> If MIke's intuition that it's one of the file system randomizations
that occasionally gets hit _and_ you determine that that's an invalid
test case (and for Luke requiring that the FS-basesd tests are all
that are necessary may be fine) I'm pretty sure you you can disable
that randomization for your specific tests.

Best,
Erick

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Tomoko Uchida
<tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Mike
>
> Thanks for sharing your experiments.
>
>> CommitsImplTest.testListCommits
>> CommitsImplTest.testGetCommit_generation_notfound
>> CommitsImplTest.testGetSegments
>> DocumentsImplTest.testGetDocumentFIelds
>
> I also found CommitsImplTest and DocumentsImplTest fail frequently,
> especially CommitsImplTest is unhappy with lucene test framework (I pointed
> that in my previous post.)
>
>> I wonder if this is somehow related to running mvn from command line vs
> running in IntelliJ since previously I was doing the latter
>
> In my personal experience, when I was running those suspicious tests on
> IntelliJ IDEA, they were always green - but I am not sure that `mvn test`
> is the cause.
>
> Thanks,
> Tomoko
>
> 2018年8月21日(火) 22:53 Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I was running these luke tests a bunch and found the following tests fail
>> intermittently; pretty frequently. Once I @Ignore them I can get a
>> consistent pass:
>>
>>
>> CommitsImplTest.testListCommits
>> CommitsImplTest.testGetCommit_generation_notfound
>> CommitsImplTest.testGetSegments
>> DocumentsImplTest.testGetDocumentFIelds
>>
>> I did not attempt to figure out why the tests were failing, but to do that,
>> I would:
>>
>> Run repeatedly until you get a failure -- save the test "seed" from this
>> run that should be printed out in the failure message Then you should be
>> able to reliably reproduce this failure by re-running with system property
>> "tests.seed" set to that value. This is used to initialize the
>> randomization that LuceneTestCase does.
>>
>> My best guess is that the failures may have to do with randomly using some
>> Directory implementation or other Lucene feature that Luke doesn't properly
>> handle?
>>
>> Hmm I was trying this again to see if I could get an example, and strangely
>> these tests are no longer failing for me after several runs, when
>> previously they failed quite often. I wonder if this is somehow related to
>> running mvn from command line vs running in IntelliJ since previously I was
>> doing the latter
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 9:01 AM Tomoko Uchida <
>> tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Could you give me some advice or comments about usage of LuceneTestCase.
>> >
>> > Some of our unit tests extending LuceneTestCase fail by assertion error
>> --
>> > sometimes, randomly.
>> > I suppose we use LuceneTestCase in inappropriate way, but cannot find out
>> > how to fix it.
>> >
>> > Here is some information about failed tests.
>> >
>> >  * The full test code is here:
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/blob/master/src/test/java/org/apache/lucene/luke/models/commits/CommitsImplTest.java
>> >  * We run tests by `mvn test` on Mac PC or Travis CI (oracle jdk8/9/10,
>> > openjdk 8/9/10), assertion errors occur regardless of platform or jdk
>> > version.
>> >  * Stack trace of an assertion error is at the end of this mail.
>> >
>> > Any advice are appreciated. Please tell me if more information is needed.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Tomoko
>> >
>> >
>> > -------------------------------------------------------
>> >  T E S T S
>> > -------------------------------------------------------
>> > Running org.apache.lucene.luke.models.commits.CommitsImplTest
>> > NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  -Dtestcase=CommitsImplTest
>> > -Dtests.method=testGetSegmentAttributes -Dtests.seed=35AF58F652536895
>> > -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.badapples=true -Dtests.locale=de
>> > -Dtests.timezone=Africa/Kigali -Dtests.asserts=true
>> > -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8
>> > NOTE: leaving temporary files on disk at:
>> >
>> >
>> /private/var/folders/xr/mrs6w1m15y1f4wkgfhn_x1dm0000gp/T/lucene.luke.models.commits.CommitsImplTest_35AF58F652536895-001
>> > NOTE: test params are:
>> >
>> >
>> codec=HighCompressionCompressingStoredFields(storedFieldsFormat=CompressingStoredFieldsFormat(compressionMode=HIGH_COMPRESSION,
>> > chunkSize=6, maxDocsPerChunk=7, blockSize=2),
>> >
>> >
>> termVectorsFormat=CompressingTermVectorsFormat(compressionMode=HIGH_COMPRESSION,
>> > chunkSize=6, blockSize=2)), sim=RandomSimilarity(queryNorm=true): {},
>> > locale=de, timezone=Africa/Kigali
>> > NOTE: Mac OS X 10.13.6 x86_64/Oracle Corporation 1.8.0_181
>> > (64-bit)/cpus=4,threads=1,free=201929064,total=257425408
>> > NOTE: All tests run in this JVM: [CommitsImplTest]
>> > Tests run: 13, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.44 sec
>> > <<< FAILURE!
>> >
>> >
>> testGetSegmentAttributes(org.apache.lucene.luke.models.commits.CommitsImplTest)
>> > Time elapsed: 0.047 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>> > java.lang.AssertionError
>> > at
>> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([35AF58F652536895:AE37E8467BC01918]:0)
>> > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
>> > at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
>> > at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:54)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.lucene.luke.models.commits.CommitsImplTest.testGetSegmentAttributes(CommitsImplTest.java:151)
>> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1737)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:934)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:970)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:984)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:829)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:879)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:890)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>> > at
>> >
>> >
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Tomoko Uchida

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to