So you are implying that the parent filter allows subsets. The code at 
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/lucene/join/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/join/CheckJoinIndex.java#L46
 implies that subset is not allowed. If I select a subset and invoke the 
checker, I get this IllegalStateException.


> On July 3, 2019 at 2:33 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Well for one thing, you might have other documents in the index that
> are neither parents nor children (in this particular relation). Also,
> consider a nested hierarchy - how can we automatically figure out
> which "generation" or "level" of parent to select?
> 
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:50 PM ANDREI SOLODIN <asolo...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > After looking through the unit tests, I got it working. The problem was 
> > that I thought the parent filter in the ToParentBlockJoinQuery can be used 
> > to select a subset of parents. It appears that the parent filter must 
> > select ALL parents, not a subset. This is not explained in the javadoc. If 
> > you want to select a subset of parents (independently of the child query), 
> > ToParentBlockJoinQuery can not be used on its own, but rather as a clause 
> > in another query.
> >
> > It would be a nice enhancement to just automatically select all parents, I 
> > mean, it is already required to be the last document in the block, why do 
> > we need to provide a query for them?
> >
> > > On July 3, 2019 at 10:52 AM ANDREI SOLODIN <asolo...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >     Thanks Mikhail.
> > >
> > >
> > >     I read through the javadoc and thought I was satisfying all the 
> > > preconditions. Obviously not :-) Is it this part that am I getting wrong: 
> > > "At search time you provide a Filter identifying the parents, however 
> > > this Filter must provide an BitSet 
> > > https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_1_1/core/org/apache/lucene/util/BitSet.html?is-external=true
> > >  per sub-reader."? If so, given the data above how do I properly create a 
> > > parent query?
> > >
> > >
> > >         > > On July 3, 2019 at 10:30 AM Mikhail Khludnev < 
> > > m...@apache.org mailto:m...@apache.org > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >         On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 6:11 PM ANDREI SOLODIN < 
> > > > asolo...@comcast.net mailto:asolo...@comcast.net > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >         >
> > > >
> > > >             > > > This returns "id00003", which is unexpected.
> > > > >
> > > > >         > >
> > > >             > > > Please check ToPBJQ javadoc. It's absolutely expected.
> > > > >
> > > > >         > >         --
> > > >         Sincerely yours
> > > >         Mikhail Khludnev
> > > >
> > > >     >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to