Hi Ryan,-
I very much appreciate this oppurtunity to submit my designs.
Best regards
On 6/18/20 1:29 AM, Ryan Ernst wrote:
> IMHO this vote is invalid because...
> it doesn’t include the red / orange variants submitted by Dustin Haver
I considered the latest submission by Dustin Haver to be his
submission, but I can see how some might like the other better and it
should have been part of the vote.
> I propose to restart the VOTE to include all submissions.
Given that I omitted the submission above, that seems reasonable. And
since we are restarting, I guess we can allow Baris to add in an entry.
Baris, please add your entry to the jira issue. I will restart the
vote next week.
> If we're going to have more options, I suggest we use "ranked voting"
I considered rank voting, but tallying a rank vote by hand can be
incredibly tedious. I don't think we should use any external tools
since that prohibits verification on who is voting from the PMC.
However, given the lastingness of this decision, I guess it is fair to
do the necessary harder tallying work of rank choice voting over
email. When I restart the vote, I will give instructions on making
multiple selections.
So, consider this vote CLOSED and VOID.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:27 AM David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com
<mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
If we're going to have more options, I suggest we use "ranked
voting": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaVxqtj8TA$>
If you create a Google Form based submission which supports a
ranked choice input, then this should make it probably not hard to
tally the results correctly. A PMC boolean would be helpful too.
~ David
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:14 AM Andrzej Białecki <a...@getopt.org
<mailto:a...@getopt.org>> wrote:
IMHO this vote is invalid because it doesn’t include all
submissions linked to that issue. Specifically, it doesn’t
include the red / orange variants submitted by Dustin Haver
(which I personally prefer over the sickly green ones … ;) )
I propose to restart the VOTE to include all submissions.
On 17 Jun 2020, at 17:04, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com
<mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
A. (PMC) I like that it retains the same idea as our current
logo with a more modern look.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:58 PM Andi Vajda <o...@ovaltofu.org
<mailto:o...@ovaltofu.org>> wrote:
C. (current logo)
Andi.. (pmc)
On Jun 15, 2020, at 15:08, Ryan Ernst <r...@iernst.net
<mailto:r...@iernst.net>> wrote:
Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
In February a contest was started to design a new logo
for Lucene [1]. That contest concluded, and I am now
(admittedly a little late!) calling a vote.
The entries are labeled as follows:
A. Submitted by Dustin Haver [2]
B. Submitted by Stamatis Zampetakis [3] Note that this
has several variants. Within the linked entry there are
7 patterns and 7 color palettes. Any vote for B should
contain the pattern number, like B1 or B3. If a B
variant wins, we will have a followup vote on the color
palette.
C. The current Lucene logo [4]
Please vote for one of the three (or nine depending on
your perspective!) above choices. Note that anyone in
the Lucene+Solr community is invited to express their
opinion, though only Lucene+Solr PMC cast binding votes
(indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please). This
vote will close one week from today, Mon, June 22, 2020.
Thanks!
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9221
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9221__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaVF6FgMug$>
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12999548/Screen%20Shot%202020-04-10%20at%208.29.32%20AM.png
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12999548/Screen*20Shot*202020-04-10*20at*208.29.32*20AM.png__;JSUlJSU!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaU-0OqLrw$>
[3]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12997768/zabetak-1-7.pdf
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12997768/zabetak-1-7.pdf__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaXc3KyVbA$>
[4]
https://lucene.apache.org/theme/images/lucene/lucene_logo_green_300.png
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lucene.apache.org/theme/images/lucene/lucene_logo_green_300.png__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaVcq8T-BA$>
--
Adrien
