I think this is a missing API in DrillDownQuery? Nicola, could you open an issue?
The filtering is as Mike Sokolov described, but I think we should add a sugar method, e.g. DrillDownQuery.remove or something, to add a negated query clause. And until this API is added and you can upgrade to it, you can construct your own TermQuery and then add it as a MUST_NOT clause. Look at how DrillDownQuery.add converts incoming facet paths to terms and use that public DrillDownQuery.term method it exposes to create your own negated TermQuery. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 11:55 AM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you are trying to show documents that have facet value V1 excluding > those with facet value V1.1, then you would need to issue a query > like: > > +f:V1 -f:V1.1 > > assuming your facet values are indexed in a field called "f". I don't > think this really has anything to do with faceting; it's just a > filtering problem. > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:47 AM nbuso <nb...@ebi.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > is there someone that can point me in the right API to negate facet > > values? > > May be this DrillDownQuery#add(dim, query) the API to permit this use > > case? > > > https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_5_2/facet/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillDownQuery.html#add-java.lang.String-org.apache.lucene.search.Query- > > > > > > Nicola > > > > > > On 2020-07-29 10:27, nbuso wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm a bit rusty with Lucene facets API and I have a common use case > > > that I would like to solve. > > > Suppose the following facet values tree: > > > > > > Facet > > > - V1 > > > - V1.1 > > > - V1.2 > > > - V1.3 > > > - V1.4 > > > - (not topK values) > > > - V2 > > > - V2.1 > > > - V2.2 > > > - V2.3 > > > - V2.4 > > > - (not topK values) > > > > > > With (not topK values) I mean values you are not showing in the UI > > > because of space/visualization problems. You usually see them with the > > > links "More ..." > > > > > > Use case: > > > 1 - select V1 => all V1.x are selected > > > 2 - de-select V1.1 > > > > > > How can I achieve this? from the search results I know the values > > > V1.[1-4] but I don't know the values that are not in topK. How can I > > > select all the V1 subtree but V1.1? > > > > > > Please let me know if you need more info. > > > > > > > > > Nicola Buso - EBI > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
