Thanks, i will use 8.5.2. i think saw some minor release switch on (z) without any issues but i will double check this.
However, i will use 8.5.2 since the bug fixes in that release may result in better performance for Lucene index. Best regards > On Nov 12, 2020, at 11:09 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Always use the most recent point release. The only time we go from x.y.z to > x.y.z+1 is if there are _significant_ problems. This is much different than > going from x.y to x.y+1... > >> On Nov 12, 2020, at 5:49 PM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote: >> >> Hi,- >> >> is it best to use 8.5.2? >> >> Best regards >> >> >> >> Release 8.5.2 >> Bug Fixes (1) >> LUCENE-9350: Partial reversion of LUCENE-9068; holding levenshtein automata >> on FuzzyQuery can end up blowing up query caches which use query objects as >> cache keys, so building the automata is now delayed to search time again. >> (Alan Woodward, Mike Drob >> >> >> Release 8.5.1 [2020-04-16] >> Bug Fixes (1) >> LUCENE-9300: Fix corruption of the new gen field infos when doc values >> updates are applied on a segment created externally and added to the index >> with IndexWriter#addIndexes(Directory). >> (Jim Ferenczi, Adrien Grand) >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
