Great, 8.11 has gone further.
Thanks Mike
Best regards
________________________________
From: Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 5:18 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org <java-user@lucene.apache.org>
Cc: Baris Kazar <baris.ka...@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Using Lucene 8.5.1 vs 8.5.2

I would use 8.5.2 if possible when considering fuzzy queries. The automation 
can be very large, but if you’re not caching the query then the extra footprint 
is not significant since it needs to be computed  at some point anyway to 
evaluate the query.

Really though, I would use 8.11 over either of those.

Mike Drob

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 1:03 PM Baris Kazar 
<baris.ka...@oracle.com<mailto:baris.ka...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Dear Folks,-
 May I please ask if using 8.5.1 is ok wrt 8.5.2?
The only change was the following where fuzzy query was fixed for a major bug 
(?).
How much does this affect the fuzzy query performance? Has Dev Team done a 
study to compare Lucene-9350 Bug vs Lucene-9068 Bug?
https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_5_2/changes/Changes.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_5_2/changes/Changes.html__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!KtFc0vtdmzloavgQ0OWbsiryKhP4RuyVDtF3q6Nqvg9FnNjj2upvWEWr-FTAlT_bpV27jxBLCWUjDw$>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9350<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9350__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!KtFc0vtdmzloavgQ0OWbsiryKhP4RuyVDtF3q6Nqvg9FnNjj2upvWEWr-FTAlT_bpV27jxAbGl5OUQ$>
Best regards


Reply via email to