Hi,
I am converting my application from
reading documents into memory, then indexing the documents
to streaming the documents to be indexed.

I quickly found out this required that the field NOT be stored.
I then quickly found out that my highlighting code requires the field to be 
stored.

I’ve been searching for an existing highlighter that doesn’t require the field 
to be stored,
and thought I’d found one in the FastVectorHighlighter,
but tests revealed this highlighter also requires the field to be stored,
though this requirement isn’t documented, or reflected in any returned 
exception.

Any suggestions for highlighting query matches without the searched field being 
stored?
I was hoping storing the offsets and positions would be enough to enable 
highlighting.

David Shifflett
Senior Lead Technologist
Enterprise Cross Domain Solutions (ECDS)
Booz Allen Hamilton
M: 831-920-8341

Reply via email to