Well. Presumably it might be a custom codec, but it incur such a high effort, that I'd raser revise an app logic, or check binary docvalues first.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:54 AM hariram ravichandran < hariramravichan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Lucene Community, > > We're currently using Lucene 4.10.4 with Lucene410Codec for storing fields > without compression. However, transitioning to Lucene 9.7.0 presents a > challenge as we haven't found a similarly uncompressed codec. > > Interestingly, even with the Mode.BEST_SPEED compression mode, the > retrieval speed for stored fields is significantly slower in Lucene 9.7.0 > compared to Lucene 4.10.4 for our use case. > > Our request is this: > Are there potential alternatives in Lucene 9.7.0 to achieve a storage > format similar to Lucene410Codec that avoids compression? > Any guidance or insights would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your > time and assistance. > > Hari > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev
