renaud cazoulat schrieb:
[...]
> By comparing Java3D and VRML you have the opportunity the emphasize
> the Java3D functionalties you
> don't have in VRML.
>
I mean the technical differences. Java 3D is part of a
programming language and VRML is a language to describe
3D data. The relationship between Java 3D and VRML is
like between JavaScript and HTML. Would you compare
JavaScript and HTML?
> Why not ? Both seems to offer the same (partial) functionnality.
[...]
I agree that they should do that :)
But i tried some of the samples provided with the VRML97Player
and compared them with CosmoPlayer. There are differences in
colors and sensor behavior.
> As things can only go better for Java3D (otherwize we wouldn't be on
> this list ;^)),
> it is not a problem of giving a "bad advertising" of java3D.
[...]
That was definitely not my intention. In my opinion
Java 3D beats VRML. Just take a look at
'The Virtual FishTank' under
http://www.tcm.org/html/fishtank/index.html
And don't forget the build-in support for HMD and
stereoscopic view.
But here and now it's still under construction
and we all should help to improve it's abilities.
Greetings, Markus Neifer
--
Please reply in list and not in email.
"Luke! I'm your father!" (Darth Vader)
