> i'm thinking that i can create a general interface (ie =
> JackDebugInterface) which all classes i create can "implement":
>
> public interface JackDebugInterface {
> public static final boolean JACK_DEBUG =3D true; // or false
Recommend you skip the "public static final" - any variable in an
interface is automatically "public static final".
> // Other debug functionalities
> public void jackDebugPrint(String);
> // .. etc
> }
>
> public class JackClass implements JackDebugInterface {
> // ...
> if ( JACK_DEBUG ) {
> // debug stuff
> jackDebugPrint("Debugging");
> }
> // ...
> }
>
> is this kosher or is there a better way of designing debug modules?
Oh, pretty much. I'd shorten the name of the JackDebug interface
(I use Dbg) and then write something like
import whatever.Dbg;
...
if (Dbg.ON) {
}
... then you don't need to worry about implementing the
interface (or for that matter, having Dbg be an interface).
/Mats
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
