I agree. It would be nice to have only one version of the SDK and RT lib.
The installation could install one or both libraries at the installer's
discretion. Then a properties file could be used to define which is
"active." This might even open up possibilities of being able to select
OpenGL or DirectX within each individual app. I've heard rumors of the
Real3D library (Lockheed-Martin) allowing their testers to switch between
libraries on-the-fly.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Artur Biesiadowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:21 PM
Subject: [JAVA3D] Opengl/DX combo for 1.3 ?
> Would it be possible to have single java3d distribution with easily
> changeable rendering machine for 1.3 ? Currenly I'm copying j3d.dll and
> j3core.jar by hand here and forth to double check if given thing works
> correctly on both targets. This is only single dll and single class
> inside jar which are different, so it should be a lot nicer to have both
> things in same package.
>
> Artur
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
body
> of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
