Osam
Your argument still isn't clear. Perhaps the code suffers from the same
problem? :^)
We also have written an application specific CAD package in Java3D and have
had minimal problems that I can lay at the feet of Java3D. Those problems
that we have had were more to do with documentation that functionality. I
can think of no other 3D development environment that could come close for
productivity and the maturity of the concept - despite the newness of the
code. We intend to continue to develop using Java3D.
The only area where I feel that a lack of planning or experience shows is in
the vecmath package which could have been significantly better (this may be
that it is too optimised for the requirements of the low level code to be to
be ideal at the application level).
I would like to thank everyone who has been and is involved in the Java3D
development for providing us with such a superb tool. Meanwhile I have an
x86 assembler which I am sure has no bugs that would prevent Osam from
"creation of a Plan, or one sphere using file menus" and would fit his needs
admirably.
Alex Bowden. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion list for Java 3D API [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of osam
Sent: 26 June 2001 18:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JAVA3D] Java 3D is Bad for geometry modelling!!!!!
it is not suitable for geometric modelling???
We have just tried to build an interactive application of
geometrical modeling with java3D but there are BUG
on very simple things like (interactive creation of a Plan, or one sphere
using
file menus from an empty or charged 3D scene.)
We are sure that java3D API is bad when we try to create CAD/CAM sofware
like
(Rhino, SolidWorks....)
"Yazel, David J." a �crit :
> I can't understand what you are saying. Could you try rewriting that a
> different way?
>
> David Yazel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: osam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 12:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JAVA3D] Java 3D is Bad for geometry modelling!!!!!
>
> We just described a bug about creation of geometric models.
> All existing software are created (90%) with C++ (CATIA, PRO/E,
RHINO.....)
> We have tryed java3D, Hence it is not suitable for geometric modelling???
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
body
> of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
body
> of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
--
*************************************************
* Djiguiba Antimbe Ecole des Mines de Douai *
* 941, rue Charles Bourseul *
* 59508 Douai *
* tel:(33) 3 27 71 23 24 *
* ou:(33) 6 60 88 91 51 *
* email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* ou: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
******************************
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
