Ok, thanks -- that's what I expected and what I
(believe) I have.
--- Raj Vaidya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:10:40 -0800, Robert Bergman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Given this picture again, my vertex data is
> provided
> >in a by-ref array aligned like this: ul, ur, ll,
> lr.
> >
> >Then (as I said previously) the index data is
> aligned
> >like this: ul, ll, lr for tri 1 and lr, ur, ul for
> >tri 2.
> >
> >Does that seem reasonable?
> >
> if your coordinates array is {P0, P1, P2, P3}, then
> the index
> *values* should belong to the *set* {0, 1, 2, 3}.
> The length of
> your indices *array*, in your specific example,
> would be 6; the
> order of indices in that array is as determined by
> CCW.
>
> Regards
>
> Raj
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
