Hi Brad, John and all others, "Brad Christiansen" wrote:
> Not directly what you want but I have had problems using > System.currentTimeMillis() in other applications. As you say the > resolution is very poor (about 10 millisecs). I changed to using the > J3DTimer. ... Ahh, thanks, that hint (together with fixing a bug in my integration code :-) made it work. I had overlooked J3DTimer all together and it really is MUCH more precise: on my W2K it reports to have a resolution of 279 nano (!) seconds, which is more than 30.000 times finer than the 10 milli second resolution of System.currentTimeMillis(). Thanks again Georg ___ ___ | + | |__ Georg Rehfeld Woltmanstr. 12 20097 Hamburg |_|_\ |___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 (40) 23 53 27 10 =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
