Javaneers,

> > pixel shader instructions, for both DirectX and OpenGL.  It looks like the
> > compiler only works for NVIDIA cards for now, but other vendors (ATI?) will
> > be able to make their own implementations.
>
> That's unlikely to happen. ATI is at the moment ahead of NVIDIA. And ATI
> won't agree on a language which has been designed solely by NVIDIA

The problem is manufacturers want to get the 'jump' on their rivals by
trying to force their 'standards' out, and fool people into thinking
everyone will adopt them. Everyone buys their cards, the other vendors
are upset, and make their own super cool feature (TM) and want in on the
action.

I am disappointed with NVIDIA for not channelling this work into
something that I would personally use. TO support something which is
negatively impacting the industry isn't a good idea. Steer clear and
hope that manufacturers realise that common standards is inevitable,
even though it means they have to compete on a more level playing
ground.

I hope we could boycot this new idea and show NVIDIA that we don't like
to play games, when it comes to playing games... as it were...

Sarcasm aside, who would seriously want to develop for something like
this? I couldn't see myself ever developing for something which wasn't
solid and accepted. The idea that another vendor will make something
newer and better, and incompatible, is too risky (and likely).

Chris

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to