Scott Rutledge wrote: >> >> If IBM would just release SWT to the Java community problem, and there >> was some rational way of bringing SWT to Java, I wouldn't have such a >> problem with it. But IBM is not going to do that any time soon. Hence, >> I'm sticking with Netbeans. >> >> Mike > > > SWT is available under the Common Public License, which has been accepted > as an open-source license. It's freely available to anyone, for any > purpose. > > ========================= > Scott Rutledge, Lead Programmer > 3D Design Division > BEQ Technologies Inc. > http://www.beq.ca > ========================= > > =========================================================================== > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body > of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help". >
By "release SWT to the Java community problem" I meant 'process', with the goal of making it a part of the standard JRE. But Sun and IBM are at each others throats. Same thing with Sun/Apple vs Java3D. Such a shame that bad politics has to get in the way of good software development. Mike =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
