>Java 5.0.
Even i read some time back that they were jumping to 5. However, is it a significant release. I thought 1.4 had more stuff in it.?
>
>An odd conflict in the article. The abstract calls this the most significant
>release in a decade! And in the middle of the article mentions J2SE being
>downloaded since December 1998.
I think they mean that the j2se has been there since '98 (not version 5). Since i have been using the beta v2 prior to that, i think they literally mean J2SE (which was earlier called the JDK). I dont know when the name changed, perhaps it changed in 1998.
>Anyone has any clue about the history of Java?
Try Sun, they might have a clue :-)
RK.
_________________________________________________________________
Marriage? http://www.bharatmatrimony.com/cgi-bin/bmclicks1.cgi?74 Join BharatMatrimony.com for free.
_______________________________________________ Java mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.jug-delhi.org/mailman/listinfo/java_jug-delhi.org
