Uwe,

Unfortunately, the release note is incorrect and needs to be updated.

All uses of JavaScript will be rejected, unless the enabling option is specified. This applies equally to JavaScript found in documentation comments and any command-line options used to specify fragments of HTML to be included in the generated documentation. It applies to uses of the "<script>...</script>" tag and to event handlers, such as "onclick", "onload", etc (See http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/dom_obj_event.asp )

-- Jon

On 01/27/2017 12:20 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Thanks!

If I understand correctly, it adds a warning for javadoc code comments that contain JS, but fails if the top or bottom parameter contains JS.

Uwe

Am 26. Januar 2017 23:10:21 MEZ schrieb Michel Trudeau <michel.trud...@oracle.com>:

    Updated release notes for 8u121.

    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/8u121-relnotes-3315208.html

-- --Michel



    Michel Trudeau <mailto:michel.trud...@oracle.com>
    January 24, 2017 at 5:44 PMvia Postbox
    
<https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=sumlink&utm_campaign=reach>
    Uwe,

    Thanks for reporting the issue.  The new command line argument
    should have been documented in the release notes.   We are fixing
    this.




    Uwe Schindler <mailto:uschind...@apache.org>
    January 22, 2017 at 4:07 AMvia Postbox
    
<https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=sumlink&utm_campaign=reach>
    Hi,

    after updating our Jenkins server to Java 8 update 121, we
    noticed the folliwng error message while building Javadocs:

    [javadoc] Constructing Javadoc information...
    [javadoc] javadoc: error - Argument for -bottom contains JavaScript.
    [javadoc] Use --allow-script-in-comments to allow use of JavaScript.
    [javadoc] 1 error

    This did not happen with update 112 that was used before.

    If fact, we use Javascript there (inside -bottom), but its use is
    legitimate and I think many other projects will be affected by
    this, too! We include Google's Code Prettify Javascript files
    into the Javadocs, so we get syntax highlighting for tons of
    examples in Apache Lucene's Javadocs. This now breaks
    unexcpectedly by this change. It is important to have source code
    examples correctly highlighted in Javadocs for readability. Maybe
    you should think about adding this to Java 9, too!

    We have a fix for this already: As we inject CSS for in
    prettify.css already into the stylesheet.css file after the
    javadocs run, the trick is to also inject the prettify.js code
    into the script.js file after the run, this would be the better
    approach. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7651
    for more info.

    Nevertheless, this change is completely undocumented:
    - No release note mentions
    - There is no documentation anywhere on the web about
    "--allow-script-in-comments" (and what does this have to do with
    comments????)

    Is this a bug because it was introduced into a minor update? I
    suspect a backport that introcuced this by accident. I would be
    fine to have this in Java 9, but suddenly adding this without any
    documentation into a minor feature release is a no-go. I am sure,
    we are not the only project affected by this.

    Unfortunately, the above fix
    (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7651) did not go
    into our latest Lucene/Solr release. 6.4.0 will come out on
    Monday, release votes are already passed. Now it is impossible to
    build it with Java 8 update 121 - not good!

    Uwe

    -----
    Uwe Schindler
    uschind...@apache.org
    ASF Member, Apache Lucene PMC / Committer
    Bremen, Germany
    http://lucene.apache.org/




Reply via email to