Hi Martin, Does your JDK 10 build have the following fix? http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk10/rev/107413b070b9
I tried and the build indeed fails when using JDK 10 without this fix as a bootstrap, but does not (seem to) fail when using JDK 10 with this fix.
Jan
From: *Martin Buchholz* <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 7:36 AM Subject: Re: RFR: 8194651: javadoc: mark the com.sun.javadoc API for removal To: Jonathan Gibbons <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: javadoc-dev <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> I can confirm that it is this commit: changeset: 48840:5e2d2067da48 tip user: ksrini date: 2018-02-09 13:58 -0800 8194651: javadoc: mark the com.sun.javadoc API for removal Reviewed-by: jjg that causes a build failure when rebuilding from scratch. I bisected my configure flags - it's the boot jdk bash ./configure --with-boot-jdk=/home/martin/jdk/jdk10 fails while bash ./configure --with-boot-jdk=/home/martin/jdk/jdk9 succeeds. Y'all are probably still using jdk9 as bootstrap. But as you all know, it's been the rule since time immemorial to use JDK N-1 to bootstrap JDK N. On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Jonathan Gibbons <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Martin, I'm not hearing any CI alarm bells ringing here, and I've just completed a clean build of the latest bits in jdk/jdk repo. There was a related javac fix that went back a few days ago, from Jan Lahoda. Is it possible that either you didn't pick up that fix, or that you have a locally modified copy of javadoc that needs to be updated? -- Jon On 02/09/2018 04:06 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:This seems to break the build * For target buildtools_interim_langtools_modules_jdk.javadoc.interim__the.BUILD_jdk.javadoc.interim_batch: /home/martin/ws/jdk/src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javadoc/main/SourcePositionImpl.java:31: warning: [removal] SourcePosition in com.sun.javadoc has been deprecated and marked for removal import com.sun.javadoc.SourcePosition; ^ error: warnings found and -Werror specified 1 error 1 warning On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Jonathan Gibbons <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: OK -- Jon On 1/23/18 2:02 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: Hi, Please review fix for 8194651, https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194651 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194651> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8194651/webrev.01/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eksrini/8194651/webrev.01/> Please note this is blocked by: JDK-8194764 Thanks Kumar
