Thanks for the review, Jon. > Am 29.05.2020 um 19:03 schrieb Jonathan Gibbons <[email protected]>: > > > I think the proposed behavior, that 'foo.bar' resolves in favor of a type or > package, is OK, and favors backwards compatibility, which is good, although > it would not be my first choice if we were starting over from scratch in an > alternate reality. > > In DocCommentParser, why do you go out of your way to store the `trimmedSig` > in the tree, and not the sig as found? Does this affect the source-fidelity > when printing out the tree? >
The trailing slash is only needed to disambiguate the intention, but it needs to be removed in order for the module lookup to succeed. Hannes > -- Jon >
