Hi Hannes,

Apologies for my tardiness. I think this might require a test case in 
TestOrdering. 
TestOrdering was created to ensure the comparator produces consistent ordering.

Kumar


> On Jun 6, 2020, at 7:11 AM, Jonathan Gibbons <jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> On 6/5/20 9:10 AM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
>> Thanks!
>> 
>>> Am 04.06.2020 um 16:51 schrieb Jonathan Gibbons 
>>> <jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com>:
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> I'll comment that the edits are inconsistent with using `{ }` around 
>>> single-statements after `if (...)`. Note sure if that was deliberate or not.
>> I know. I usually try to be consistent with the style of the method I’m 
>> adding to, which in this case unfortunately varies within a single class.
>> 
>> Hannes
> 
> Consistency is good ;-)
> 
> -- Jon
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>> Test: yay for Text Blocks.
>>> 
>>> -- Jon
>>> 
>>> On 6/4/20 7:19 AM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
>>>> Please review:
>>>> 
>>>> JBS: 
>>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs.openjdk.java.net%2Fbrowse%2FJDK-8246429&amp;data=02%7C01%7Ckusrinivasan%40vmware.com%7C0e72eb7ac9ea4fbcb2a208d80a23e56f%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637270496577278712&amp;sdata=gXPqYbmKk%2F02PtWFEmC9SekXezCCN3H8uOcbV3Xt0dc%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>> Webrev: 
>>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fcr.openjdk.java.net%2F~hannesw%2F8246429%2Fwebrev.00%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Ckusrinivasan%40vmware.com%7C0e72eb7ac9ea4fbcb2a208d80a23e56f%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637270496577278712&amp;sdata=Kq70LDFQ7Rpv%2FlTrYX9ele3PRLKIYKUNNPkyEeIM62g%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>> 
>>>> I originally fixed this as part of 8198705: Javadoc search needs a fix to 
>>>> handle duplicate package names in different modules, but it is a distinct 
>>>> issue so I filed a separate bug for it.
>>>> 
>>>> The fix adds an additional final step to element comparisons, which is to 
>>>> compare the name of the modules containing the elements. So far the final 
>>>> step in most comparators was to compare the fully qualified name of the 
>>>> elements.
>>>> 
>>>> Hannes

Reply via email to