On Wed, 19 May 2021 10:38:02 GMT, liach <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/formats/html/markup/ContentBuilder.java
>> line 99:
>>
>>> 97: for (Content content: contents) {
>>> 98: if (content.isValid())
>>> 99: return true;
>>
>> If this is correct, then it deserves a comment. The reason is that it looks
>> counterintuitive: I would expect isValid to have the semantics of &&, not ||.
>
> I looked at the usages of `isValid`; all of them are guarding the calls to
> `HtmlTree.add`, in `SerialFieldWriter`, `TagletWriter`, and `HtmlTree.add`
> itself. Hence, if a content builder has both valid and invalid parts, I still
> believe it should be added to the html tree, where only the valid subparts
> can be accepted. I shall document the reasons in an `implSpec` section.
I was initially unsure about this, too. But take a look at
`HtmlTree.add(Content)` which handles `ContentBuilder` arguments in the
following way:
if (content instanceof ContentBuilder) {
((ContentBuilder) content).contents.forEach(this::add);
}
Thus, if a ContentBuilder contains any valid Content objects, they will be
added, while the invalid ones will be silently dropped.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4066
