On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:05:03 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Interesting: We have property `doclet.Annotation_Types` (with underscore) >> defined in `standard.properties` and `doclet.AnnotationTypes` (without >> underscore) in `doclets.properties. Both properties have the same value. >> Smells like another cleanup task. > > There's old naming and new naming. We still use old naming for older > releases, and use the new naming for recent releases. There's low-level code > to select the right form, depending on the version. > > So yes, for now, the internal code is inconsistent for old/new terminology, > and will never be completely new-clean because of declarations like > `TypeElement`, but the important point is that the generated output should > always be consistent, at least per the policy for that release. Separately, I have *long* wanted a general clean up on resource naming, replacing the pervasive boring ubiquitous less-than-helpful `doclet.` prefix with something more informative. I would like to see a prefix that indicates the resource file (e.g. `tool` | `toolkit` | `html` ) and the category/kind (such as `warning`, `error`, `help`, `content`) Maybe this is something to do in the next release (19). The first steps are to decide on a naming policy and to write an internal utility that will modify source code and resource files. Strongly related in such a utility would be the sort the contents of the resource files. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6061