On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 23:34:21 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review a moderately simple improvement for `JavadocTester` and a 
> related new test.
> 
> A new `OutputChecker` class is introduced that mostly supersedes the existing 
> methods to check the output generated by javadoc and the standard doclet. A 
> self-imposed restriction is that no existing tests are modified.
> 
> The new class can be used to check files generated by the doclet and the 
> streams written by the tool. It can be configured to check for ordered output 
> or not, overlapping output, and complete coverage, and can search for literal 
> strings and regular expressions.  
> 
> There is a corresponding new test which is a non-standard use of 
> `JavadocTester`, since it is designed to test `JavadocTester` itself, and not 
> javadoc or the doclet.   (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)  Various methods 
> are overridden so that the operation of the underlying methods can be checked.
> 
> Although it is a goal to NOT modify the code of any existing tests, it turns 
> out to be reasonable to adapt some of the existing `check...` methods to use 
> the new `OutputChecker`.  All javadoc tests pass, both locally and on all 
> standard platforms.  Many/most uses of the existing `checkOutput` method 
> provide "ordered" strings, and are candidates to use the new ordered check. 
> But enough uses are _not_ ordered, so it is not reasonable to change the 
> default at this time.  It is noted as a TODO to examine the appropriate test 
> cases, so that we can decide whether to fix those tests and change the 
> default.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: ce3ed65a
Author:    Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/ce3ed65ac3411a533052a8c01231f7e540803afb
Stats:     1072 lines in 2 files changed: 918 ins; 90 del; 64 mod

8273154: Provide a JavadocTester method for non-overlapping, unordered output 
matching

Reviewed-by: prappo

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5743

Reply via email to