Hi all! I am trying to figure out if the javadoc tool should be ok with a short class name as parameter type. Is there any specification on @link tag format?
E.g. javadoc for `java.io.File#isDirectory` contains the following "{@link java.nio.file.Files#readAttributes(Path,Class,LinkOption[])". LinkOption isn't resolved but the generated html correctly navigates the "readAttributes" method. This makes me suspect that the signatures are checked by short names only. But this leads to the problem with the ambiguity: ```class Foo { /** * {@link #bar(Bar)} */ void foo() {} void bar(Foo2.Bar f) {} void bar(Foo1.Bar f) {} } class Foo1 { static class Bar {} } class Foo2 { static class Bar {} }``` Here the link points to the first method as it is written in the class "Foo" which looks wrong, or is it ok? Thank you, Anna Kozlova