On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:01:42 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That's not the right question. The question is, how can we best replace the
> functionality of those tests. It's the relative link that's important, not
> the location. Since the comment containing the relative link can no longer be
> placed on a top level declaration, they should be moved to a declaration
> where they are legal, such as on a method.
Hm... While I understand what you are saying, I also think that we already have
tests that exercise relative links on methods. Those tests are located in that
same directory, no? Here,
test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/doclet/testRelativeLinks/pkg/C.java:
public class C {
/**
* Here is a relative link in a field:\u0130
* <a href="relative-field-link.html">relative field link</a>.
*/
public C field = null;
/**
* Here are two relative links in a method:
* <a href="relative-method-link.html">relative method link</a>,
* <a href="#method-fragment">fragment method link</a>.
*/
public C method() { return null;}
/**
* Here is a relative link in a method:
* <a
* href="relative-multi-line-link.html">relative-multi-line-link</a>.
*
* <a id="method-fragment">Method fragment</a>.
*/
public C multipleLineTest() { return null;}
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19/pull/54
