On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 14:58:14 GMT, Pavel Rappo <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Please review this explorative refactoring for VisibleMemberTable (VMT).
>> 
>> This is the first round of refactoring for VMT. This round is about *method 
>> members*: declared (overriding and not) and inherited.
>> 
>> During this work I gained some insight into internal workings of VMT, fixed 
>> what was feasible and left TODOs and FIXMEs for everything else. Leaving 
>> those comments might look untidy, but leaving them out is wasteful: they 
>> clearly mark issues that should be revisited in upcoming rounds of 
>> refactoring.
>> 
>> As I see it today, the main issue with VMT is that implements complex and 
>> error-prone computations from Java Language Specification (JLS) by hand. For 
>> example, VMT interprets JLS rules for relations such as _inherits_, 
>> _overrides_ and _hides_. As one would imagine, sometimes VMT does it 
>> incorrectly. It would be better to eventually re-implement VMT using 
>> `javax.lang.model` as much as possible. Unlike that of `jdk.javadoc`, the 
>> day job of `javax.lang.model` is to provide JLS services.
>
> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Respond to feedback

Approved, although there are still some outstanding suggestions for comments.

Generally, this is obviously a big project, so well done on progress so far.

It is well worth aligning the functionality and terminology of this code with 
current JLS, and so I (generally) encourage JLS references in key places, 
preferably in a stylized manner (to facilitate checking and/or updates).

I also think it is worth adding notes comparing the functionality here with 
that of plain-old `Elements.getAllMembers`.  That is a simple building block 
that returns a list-y set of the members of a `TypeElement`, but VMT needs to 
do more:
* handle members of so-called hidden types
* build a DAG for each method, relating that method to corresponding methods in 
the supertypes of the type element, for use by `@link` and `Specified By:`.
* ...

-------------

Marked as reviewed by jjg (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12887

Reply via email to