On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 00:37:36 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional 
>> commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into 8304135
>>  - Extract getActualMethod
>>  - Impose (almost) legacy order on implemented methods
>>    
>>    The legacy order is generated by an application of
>>    Utils.overriddenMethod followed by application of
>>    Utils.addSuperInterfaces.
>>  - Fix errors reported by jcheck
>>  - Initial commit
>
> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/toolkit/util/VisibleMemberTable.java
>  line 1015:
> 
>> 1013:                     // will be computed once the complete sequence is 
>> available
>> 1014:                     var simpleOverride = false;
>> 1015:                     result = result.append(new 
>> OverrideData(toDeclaringType(s,
> 
> `append` is *horrible* on `javac.util.List`
> 
> Unless there is a string reason to be using it, you should probably be using 
> plain old collection Lists, like `ArrayList` or `List.of`. 
> 
> If you're using `javac.util.List` because you're calling javac internal 
> functionality that requires that kind of List, then your usage should be in 
> methods in `WorkArounds`, which is intended to the the only doclet class that 
> accesses javac internal methods and types.
> 
> FYI, `javac.util.List` are immutable linked lists. New lists are created by 
> prepending new entries. They predate use of Collections lists, and 
> `java.util.List` was only retrofitted as a supertype later on in JDK 6 or 7.  
> `append` works by copying the entire list.  Internally in `javac` 
> `ListBuffer` is used to create (temporary) mutable lists which are then made 
> immutable by calling `.toList()`

Replied here https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14221#discussion_r1224059741

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14221#discussion_r1224109990

Reply via email to