On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:00:21 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/toolkit/taglets/LinkTaglet.java
>> line 38:
>>
>>> 36: import jdk.javadoc.internal.doclets.toolkit.Content;
>>> 37:
>>> 38: public abstract class LinkTaglet extends BaseTaglet {
>>
>> `{@link}` has finally got its own taglet. However, I note that `{@code}` has
>> lost its taglet.
>>
>> In the markup sense, `{@link}` is to `{@code}` as `{@linkplain}` is to
>> `{@literal}`. If you agree with this, then I think we should leave
>> `{@code}`, rather than `{@literal}`.
>
> I agree, but may do that separately, or as part of subsequent cleanup
I may leave the types as-is but try and fix it in the doc comments. The
problem is in the class names and the crossed-over functionality.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14793#discussion_r1258909667
