On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 01:44:36 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review a medium change that is a follow-up to recent work to cleanup 
> the builders and writers in the doclet.
> 
> This change is primarily focussed on cleaning up the code to generate summary 
> tables for each kind of member. The bulk of the code is moved from 
> `ClassWriter` to `AbstractMemberWriter`, with just a top-level loop remaining 
> in `ClassWriter` to iterate over the different kinds of members. In addition, 
> there is some cleanup in `WriterFactory`, renaming the factory methods and 
> ensuring that those that are declared are used.
> 
> One result of the cleanup is that each member writer now defines and provides 
> two methods, `buildSummary` and `buildDetails` that each create content to go 
> on the page of the enclosing type.
> 
> This work uncovered two issues which are _not_ addressed here, and which may 
> be addressed in future work.
> 
> 1. There is a discrepancy between the lists of `VMT.Kind` used in 
> `AbstractMemberWriter` (for the complete lists used to generate pages and the 
> lists of `VMT.Kind` defined in `VMT.Kind` itself, which are indirectly used 
> to generate entries in the sub-navbar for the pages of type elements.  Those 
> lists (defined as `Set`s, indirectly rely on the order in which the 
> `VMT.Kind` members are declared, although the order itself is not specified.
> 
> 2. There is an inconsistency in the subtypes of `HtmlDocletWriter`, which all 
> generate pages, as to how those classes are invoked. It is about 50/50 
> whether the classes declare a `build()` method to be called from outside, or 
> whether the classes declare a `static void generate()` method to be used 
> instead.
> 
> --
> 
> The initial commit contains two changes to tests, copied from PR #15046.  
> These changes will go away once that PR is approved, integrated and merged 
> with this work.

Mismatching bug id and the test changes suggest an unclean split between this 
PR and https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15046

The tests should belong to the latter PR.

test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/doclet/testAnnotationTypes/TestAnnotationTypes.java 
line 27:

> 25:  * @test
> 26:  * @bug      4973609 8015249 8025633 8026567 6469561 8071982 8162363 
> 8182765 8223364
> 27:              8242056 8261976 8223358 8313204

Ditto for the bug id.

test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/doclet/testOverriddenMethods/TestOverrideMethods.java
 line 26:

> 24: /*
> 25:  * @test
> 26:  * @bug 8157000 8192850 8182765 8223607 8261976 8281376 8313204

That bug id differs from that of this PR; typo?

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15049#pullrequestreview-1549640132
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15049#discussion_r1276153457
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15049#discussion_r1276152573

Reply via email to