On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 22:59:57 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR makes JavaDoc and DocLint produce more helpful diagnostic output 
>> when encounter an unknown tag.
>> 
>> Before:
>> 
>> 
>> MyClass.java:4: warning: no main description
>>  * @implSpite {@linkpain Object#hashCode}}
>>    ^
>> MyClass.java:4: error: unknown tag: implSpite
>>  * @implSpite {@linkpain Object#hashCode}}
>>    ^
>> MyClass.java:4: error: unknown tag: linkpain
>>  * @implSpite {@linkpain Object#hashCode}}
>>               ^
>> MyClass.java:5: error: unknown tag: danger
>>  * @danger
>>    ^
>> 
>> 
>> After:
>> 
>> 
>>  * @implSpite {@linkpain Object#hashCode}}
>>    ^
>> MyClass.java:4: error: unknown tag: implSpite; the most similar tags are: 
>> implSpec, implNote
>>  * @implSpite {@linkpain Object#hashCode}}
>>    ^
>> Note: An unknown tag has been reported. Mistyped? Forgot to add a custom tag 
>> or register a taglet?
>> MyClass.java:4: error: unknown tag: linkpain; the most similar tags are: 
>> linkplain
>>  * @implSpite {@linkpain Object#hashCode}}
>>               ^
>> MyClass.java:5: error: unknown tag: danger
>>  * @danger
>>    ^
>> 
>> 
>> As you can see, the output has changed in two ways. Firstly, the tags that 
>> are similar to the unknown tag might be suggested. Secondly, an auxiliary 
>> note to help troubleshoot the unknown tag is provided. That note is provided 
>> once, close to the first reported unknown tag. This is done to not clutter 
>> the output in case multiple tags are reported.
>> 
>> For details, see the actual change.
>
> test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/doclet/testUknownTags/TestUnknownTags.java line 
> 125:
> 
>> 123:                 package x;
>> 124: 
>> 125:                 /**
> 
> :-) I bet the spelling checker in the IDE loves this :-)

Initially, I added a snarky code comment, but then removed it before publishing 
the PR. Something along the lines: pinch your nose and calm down your IDE.

FWIW, I note two things. Firstly, those tags in test come from these three 
sources:

 - actual typos in OpenJDK mainline
 - actual typos in codebase before it was open-sourced
 - made-up typos

Secondly, the significant portion of those tags are actual typos.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15494#discussion_r1312803934

Reply via email to