On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 16:19:06 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer <hann...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> My original intention with this cleanup was to keep using
> `[Html]IndexBuilder' for both the "All Classes" and the main index, but just
> improve separation of code and naming of classes. However, I then discovered
> two things:
>
> - The "All Classes" page is so simple to build that it doesn't justify using
> a complex builder class. In fact, moving the necessary functionality from
> `IndexBuilder` to `AllClassesIndexWriter` just added about a dozen lines of
> code to the latter, while making `IndexBuilder` much simpler by removing its
> dual purpose.
> - The separation of code between `toolkit.util.IndexBuilder` and
> `formats.html.HtmlIndexBuilder`, although seemingly random at first sight,
> actually reflects the usage of functionality provided by the respective
> packages. Although with a single output format the separation between these
> packages is not as important as it used to be, it is still nice to keep
> things separated.
>
> Based on these two findings, I decided to pull the "All Classes" code into
> "AllClassesIndexWriter", but maintain the implementation of
> `[Html]IndexBuilder` across the two classes/packages. Although the base
> `IndexBuilder` class is technically able to function on its own without the
> HTML-specific enhancements, I made the class abstract in order to point out
> that the HTML enhancements in `HtmlIndexBuilder` are actually essential for
> our us.
src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/formats/html/AllClassesIndexWriter.java
line 107:
> 105: }
> 106:
> 107: private Set<TypeElement> getTypeElements() {
Suggestion:
private Set<TypeElement> getTypeElements() {
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15746#discussion_r1327032004
