On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 16:21:48 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer <hann...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Please review a change to add support for restricted methods to JavaDoc. The > bulk of this patch was contributed by @mcimadamore. It adds a warning note to > the summary and details of restricted methods and a superscript to links to > restricted methods, similar to what we already do with elements belonging to > preview APIs. I added a summary page to list all restricted methods as well > as a test. > > To see the wording of this feature in context, the relevant parts of > generated documentation can be reviewed here: > > - [Method > summary](https://cr.openjdk.org/~hannesw/8316972/api.00/java.base/java/lang/foreign/AddressLayout.html#method-summary) > - [Method > details](https://cr.openjdk.org/~hannesw/8316972/api.00/java.base/java/lang/foreign/AddressLayout.html#withTargetLayout(java.lang.foreign.MemoryLayout)) > - [Restricted Methods > list](https://cr.openjdk.org/~hannesw/8316972/api.00/restricted-list.html) > - [Restricted Methods help > section](https://cr.openjdk.org/~hannesw/8316972/api.00/help-doc.html#restricted) > > Since the messages for deprecated, preview, and restricted elements all use > the same CSS in our default stylesheet, I decided to combine them into a > single CSS rule. It is still possible to define distinct styles for these > features in user-provided stylesheets. Question: we have this section on restricted method in the java/lang/foreign javadoc: https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/21/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/foreign/package-summary.html#restricted Should the text that javadoc generate for restricted method point here? Or should we move this text onto a separate HTML page, and link to that instead? I note that for preview feature we do not link to anywhere else, so maybe what is done in this PR is sufficient. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16188#issuecomment-1764484359