On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:26:34 GMT, Pavel Rappo <pra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains eight additional >> commits since the last revision: >> >> - Distinguish subinterfaces, use clearer terms >> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into >> feature/jd-use-super-typearg >> - Review changes >> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into >> feature/jd-use-super-typearg >> - Fix tests >> - Improve localization >> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into >> feature/jd-use-super-typearg >> - Use page to check extends/implements type arguments > > src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/formats/html/resources/standard.properties > line 286: > >> 284: subclasses with parameters of type A. \ >> 285: You can access this page by first going to the package, class or >> interface, then clicking on \ >> 286: the USE link in the navigation bar. > > Thanks for catching this! Consider this wording: > > > doclet.help.use.body=\ > Each documented package, class or interface has its own Use page, which > lists \ > packages, classes, interfaces, methods, constructors and fields that use > any \ > part of that package, class or interface. Given a class or interface A, > its \ > Use page includes subclasses or subinterfaces of A, fields declared as A, > \ > methods that return A, methods and constructors with parameters of type > A, \ > and subclasses or subinterfaces with parameters of type A. You can access > \ > this page by first going to the package, class or interface, then > clicking \ > on the USE link in the navigation bar. > > > There are a couple of other issues there which should be fixed in a separate > PR. This is an improvement. Applying as I don't see any problem in your wording. ("class or interface" is an established term) ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17414#discussion_r1500226393
