On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:02:32 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I'll look to upgrade these. In the original impl of DocLint, it was >> something of a conscious decision to avoid supporting input elements. >> >> I'm surprised LINK is phrasing content: I thought it could only appear in >> HEAD elements. I will check. >> >> Generally, moving towards HTML 5 names is a good goal, but some of that >> could/should be part of a DocLint cleanup. This is primarily just a merge, >> not an upgrade. And, while DocLint is intended to be helpful, it is >> specifically for doc comments and their likely content, and not a full >> conformance checker. > > I see LINK can be phrasing content under certain conditions. > I'll adjust the enum accordingly, but I do not think it worth updating > DocLint at this time to do any additional checking. > I'm not sure whether marking it as INLINE content will break DocLint tests. tools/doclint/html/OtherTagsTest.java needs to be updated ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19916#discussion_r1697383203
