One specification question for Alex: we call an annotation interface's element
"element". What about the element-value pair that binds a value to an interface
element in an annotation? Can we call this element-value pair an "element", or
is there any other more proper name that is still concise? For context:
> [This annotation] is an array element of an array-valued element named {@code
> value} in a container annotation
________________________________
From: core-libs-dev <[email protected]> on behalf of Adam Sotona
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2024 8:55 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>;
[email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected]
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: RFR: 8336754: Remodel TypeAnnotation to "has" instead of "be" an
Annotation [v8]
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 00:04:48 GMT, Chen Liang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> `TypeAnnotation` is not an annotation, as it should not be used in places
>> like `AnnotationValue.ofAnnotation`. Thus it's remodeled to contain an
>> annotation at a given location instead of to be an annotation.
>>
>> Depends on #20205.
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
> by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 12 additional commits since
> the last revision:
>
> - remove compile, use element-value, break long sentences
> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into
> fix/typeanno-model
> - Improve docs for repeating, default, and value name
> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into
> fix/typeanno-model
> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into
> fix/typeanno-model
> - More refinements from alex
> - Artifact -> construct
> - More about Annotation, add equals note
> - Further refine wording
> - Refine the spec of TypeAnnotation per Alex feedback
> - ... and 2 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f3707e9b...3a91a3a5
Marked as reviewed by asotona (Reviewer).
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20247#pullrequestreview-2215642863
