On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Todd Costella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There has been some clarification of the license. A bit of commentary can be > found on Matt Cutts blog. He works for Google and tends to have his head > screwed on pretty well from my perspective. > > http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-license-agreement/
Thanks for this pointer. I followed it to an even more comprehensive post by this guy about Chrome: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/common-google-chrome-objections/ It is definitely worth a read for anyone following this thread. -Van -- | Michael "Van" Riper | http://weblogs.java.net/blog/van_riper/ | http://www.linkedin.com/in/vanriper ---- | Silicon Valley Web JUG | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | https://sv-web-jug.dev.java.net ---- | Silicon Valley Google Technology User Group | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://sv-gtug.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
