Reinier, I think I will need to boil our discussion down to a blogpost of my own as I feel that some aspects were left out. I actually think some kind of proposal can be formed from our discussions.
Cheers, Viktor On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Nope, Fan's null support is incomplete, bordering on broken. At least, > if Stephen's blogpost is the extent of Fan's support for nullity. > > I've reduced the extensive thread that Viktor and I have been having > about this in another thread here, to a blogpost, and I've mailed > Stephen for comments about it. Nullity just isn't this simple, folks. > Sorry. > > Read more here: > http://www.zwitserloot.com/2008/10/23/non-null-in-static-languages/ > > On Oct 23, 10:20 am, BoD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I remember a few weeks ago there was a discussion here about > > not-nullability in Java, how to avoid NPEs, and people were discussing a > > way of forbid variables to hold null. > > Well it seems that they just did that in the Fan language : seehttp:// > www.jroller.com/scolebourne/entry/life_in_the_fan_lane > > > > BoD > > > -- Viktor Klang Senior Systems Analyst --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
