+1. The simpler the better. I wouldn't mind javadoc in text files as long as the IDE can parse it and I can read it.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:37 AM, mbien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I prefere plain old and simple html pages over anything else which > looks interactive and consumer oriented without any usability > benefits. The old javadoc workflow is just perfect, start typing and > press return from time to time and you have your result within > seconds. I hope there will be a retro version of the javafx doc > without those javascript driven information hiding concepts. > > But maybe this is more attractive for the JavaFX target audience since > they are probably more mouse and eyecandy driven anyway. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
