But aren't dynproxies terribly slow? I thought that's why people dabble on invokedynamic.
/Casper On Nov 6, 8:16 pm, "John Nilsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It shouldn't be to hard to implement traits as a library in current Java > using a dynamic proxy. > Should make for an interesting project. > > BR, > Jphn > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Mark Derricutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please please please bring on traits! I'm somewhat on the fence of rather > > seeing traits than closures in java sooner than the other. > > > I'm finding LOTS of places in my code where traits would just make things > > cleaner. > > > More and more I think I just want scala :) > > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, hlovatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I thinks that Traits are a great idea for Java and judging by #215 the > >> posse, particularly Dick, like them. I wrote about them for Java 7 in: > > >>http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=220916 > > >> What do you think? > > > -- > > "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." -- > > Bill Harlan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
