*hum* Scala. Scala. Scala-Scala-ching-ching-ching. *hum*

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Mark Derricutt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Surely if they'd said/planned this from the outset we'd be much farther
> along, rather than open sourcing the implementation and keeping the language
> spec. locked in Suns control?
>
> I was just wondering how well JavaFX script could sit on the server side (I
> have a few small pet project ideas I'm planning to look at on the weekend),
> animations aside - theres a lot in the language that people have been
> wanting from Java.next.  How will Sun split their priorities between the two
> languages?
>
> Is late 2010 still the estimated time for Java7?
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Frederic Simon 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> But 2 other important stuff Mark Reinhold said:
>> - Sun will first cut the JDK into isolated modules in Java 7 before adding
>> anything.
>> - Backward compatibility is less important than modularity... WOW!?!
>> Basically there will be a clean Java and then you can add the ugly Java
>> modules for backward compatibility on top.
>>
>> For the language feature looks like they are really waiting for the
>> community to work on OpenJDK and stop saying: Sun do this! Sun do that!
>> Frankly, I understand them.
>> Java should not be a pure Sun business anymore!
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Casper Bang <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yes, confirmed by Mark Reinhold, Chief Engineer of SE, at Devoxx.
>>>
>>> /Casper
>>>
>>> On Dec 11, 7:30 pm, "Mark Derricutt" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Have closures officially been nixed from Java 7 then?
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Tom Hawtin <
>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > On Dec 11, 6:02 pm, Hairless_ape <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > I'm afraid that with this, Java is dying.
>>> >
>>> > > Bingo!
>>> >
>>> > > I believe that appears on the "worst blog titles for 2009" Devoxx
>>> > > whiteboard.
>>> >
>>> > > Tom
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code."
>>> --
>>> > Bill Harlan
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.jfrog.org/
>> http://freddy33.blogspot.com/
>> http://nothingisinfinite.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." --
> Bill Harlan
>
> >
>


-- 
Viktor Klang
Senior Systems Analyst

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to