I would expect that it will bring
- faster startup/reload times
- smaller jvm footprint
- module reloads for fixes and upgrades without having to do a server
restart.
- hopefully we might get better small scale java hosting to rival the
current php offerings.

the downloading of modules refers more to applets. A server jvm will
load from the local source.

ngo


On Dec 28, 11:34 pm, "Robert Lally" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've been trying to understand if the proposed modular JRE architecture will
> bring any benefits to those who predominantly develop sever-side
> applications. I can imagine that startup times might be slightly reduced,
> potentially memory footprint might be reduced, but other than that I can't
> see many big advantages. On the down side, I imagine that there will be more
> application failures when an app that appears to be working tries to access
> a library that isn't in this particular installation. I've heard all about
> how the JRE might go and download the components it needs, on demand; to
> which I respond .. not in my secure hosting environment you won't.
>
> Is my FUD here misplaced? Are we really trading the security of the
> traditional server-side Java stalwarts to make Java more attractive on the
> client side? I'm sure that there'll be an 'All-in-one' download available -
> I'm also sure that I've lost times of the occasions when an SA, with
> profound knowlege of UNIX, but little knowledge of Java, installed a JRE
> instead of a JDK. Adding more choices can't make life easier for them, and
> by extension .. me.
>
> It is, of course, certainly possible that I'm getting nervous over nothing.
>
> R.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to