Uncle. Please. Can we go two posts without a mention of
closures! :o)
On Jan 18, 5:22 pm, Mark Derricutt <[email protected]> wrote:
> One thing that intrigues me with the whole closures deal. I never actually
> got a chance to try it out and keep forgetting, but afaik the BGGA closure
> prototype which was released some time ago provided a) a javac+closures
> replacement b) a supporting library jar which would allow one to compile and
> run java+closures code on a standard JDK6 jvm (please correct if wrong).
>
> If people are so set on java+closures, they could just start using that,
> contribute a javax.collections.* closure-enabled library and we could be
> happy as a man named larry - who larry is I have no idea, nor do I know why
> he's often so happy.
>
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Closures has certainly excited the entire community. In the sense that
> > everyone is running around bawling at the top of their collective
> > voice that their pet proposal is clearly the only right answer and
> > everyone who doesn't see this is an idiot. I'm as guilty of this as
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
